🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.